Compare towns

Cavendish vs Castleton vs Sharon vs Lincoln

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Cavendish has the shortest commute (19 min average).
Castleton has the most affordable homes ($225k median).
Sharon has the most kids (21% under 18).
Lincoln has the highest household income ($97k).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureCavendishCastletonSharonLincoln
People
Population
1,242Lowest
4,453Highest
1,577
1,394
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+1.8%
VT: +2.8%
-5.5%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
+3.9%
VT: +2.8%
+4.1%Highest
VT: +2.8%
Median age
45.2±5.9
5% above VT
38.3±4.3Lowest
11% below VT
45.6±7.7
6% above VT
45.7±3.6Highest
6% above VT
Lincoln and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
18.3%±4.8
VT: 17.9%
18.8%±6.4
VT: 17.9%
21%±5Highest
VT: 17.9%
15.1%±3.7Lowest
VT: 17.9%
Sharon and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
23.6%±2
VT: 21.4%
20.7%±4.6Lowest
VT: 21.4%
25.1%±3.6Highest
VT: 21.4%
22.3%±3
VT: 21.4%
Sharon and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
39.3%
VT: 43.8%
37.9%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
37.9%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
43.5%Highest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
4.3%±1.9
VT: 7%
19.3%±1.8Highest
VT: 7%
1.5%±0.9Lowest
VT: 7%
2.9%±2.1
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$89,063±$29k
10% above VT
$73,854±$23kLowest
9% below VT
$84,375±$17k
4% above VT
$96,667±$18kHighest
19% above VT
Lincoln and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$285,100±$40k
10% below VT
$224,800±$71kLowest
29% below VT
$346,700±$37k
10% above VT
$365,200±$30kHighest
15% above VT
Lincoln and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,000±$546
19% below VT
$1,137±$195
8% below VT
$1,386±$155Highest
12% above VT
$870±$47Lowest
29% below VT
Sharon and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,948
22% below VT
$3,167Lowest
37% below VT
$5,903
17% above VT
$6,100Highest
21% above VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
28.9%±27
VT: 48.4%
67.7%±21.9Highest
VT: 48.4%
19.8%±17.9Lowest
VT: 48.4%
49.1%±25.5
VT: 48.4%
Castleton and Lincoln are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
6.3%
VT: 10.1%
12.5%Highest
VT: 10.1%
3%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
7.5%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
81.3%
VT: 73.2%
79%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
79.7%
VT: 73.2%
88.1%Highest
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1968Lowest
8 yrs older than VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
1981Highest
5 yrs newer than VT
1977
1 yr newer than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
19 minLowest
21% below VT
19 min
17% below VT
26 min
12% above VT
30 minHighest
26% above VT
Work from home
18.5%±6.6
VT: 16.9%
6.2%±3.9Lowest
VT: 16.9%
12.7%±3.7
VT: 16.9%
18.8%±5.6Highest
VT: 16.9%
Lincoln and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #39 of 70 in VT — —
School district Green Mountain Unified School District #77 Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 Sharon School District Lincoln Town School District
High school in town None in town None in town None in town None in town
On TownTapestry
Old photos in Our Story None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.