Compare towns

Cavendish vs Burke vs Randolph vs Whitingham

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Cavendish has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.8%).
Burke has the most people working from home (23.4%).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Whitingham has the most affordable homes ($262k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureCavendishBurkeRandolphWhitingham
People
Population
1,242Lowest
1,317
4,843Highest
1,368
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+1.8%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-5.8%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%
VT: +2.8%
-1%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
45.2±5.9
5% above VT
41.1±4.8
5% below VT
40.4±7.4Lowest
6% below VT
46.4±7.1Highest
8% above VT
Whitingham and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
18.3%±4.8
VT: 17.9%
23%±4Highest
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4Lowest
VT: 17.9%
19.8%±4.5
VT: 17.9%
Burke and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
23.6%±2
VT: 21.4%
21.7%±2.2Lowest
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2
VT: 21.4%
31.1%±2.3Highest
VT: 21.4%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
39.3%
VT: 43.8%
41.4%Highest
VT: 43.8%
40.8%
VT: 43.8%
32.8%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
4.3%±1.9
VT: 7%
3.6%±2.3
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5Highest
VT: 7%
2.2%±1.9Lowest
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$89,063±$29kHighest
10% above VT
$87,143±$17k
7% above VT
$76,758±$6k
5% below VT
$70,625±$11kLowest
13% below VT
Cavendish and Burke are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$285,100±$40k
10% below VT
$340,600±$18kHighest
8% above VT
$278,700±$38k
12% below VT
$262,300±$30kLowest
17% below VT
Burke and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,000±$546
19% below VT
$938±$191
24% below VT
$1,172±$173Highest
5% below VT
$673±$150Lowest
45% below VT
Randolph and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,948Lowest
22% below VT
$5,177Highest
about the VT average
$4,698
7% below VT
$5,055
about the VT average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
28.9%±27Lowest
VT: 48.4%
74.6%±31Highest
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8
VT: 48.4%
62.7%±47.3
VT: 48.4%
Burke and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
6.3%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
10%
VT: 10.1%
7.7%
VT: 10.1%
15.5%Highest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
81.3%
VT: 73.2%
88.6%Highest
VT: 73.2%
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
85.2%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1968Lowest
8 yrs older than VT
1981Highest
5 yrs newer than VT
1971
5 yrs older than VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
19 minLowest
21% below VT
25 min
8% above VT
21 min
12% below VT
38 minHighest
62% above VT
Work from home
18.5%±6.6
VT: 16.9%
23.4%±6.8Highest
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7
VT: 16.9%
9.7%±5.2Lowest
VT: 16.9%
Burke and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — — #55 of 70 in VT —
School district Green Mountain Unified School District #77 Kingdom East Unified Union School District #64 Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Twin Valley Unified School District #75
High school in town None in town None in town Randolph Union High School Twin Valley Middle High School
Students per teacherat that high school — —
9.4Highest
7.8Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in Our Story None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.