Compare towns

Castleton vs Randolph vs Vershire vs Whitingham

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Castleton has the shortest commute (19 min average).
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.1%).
Vershire has the most affordable homes ($209k median).
Whitingham has the most homeowners (85.2%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureCastletonRandolphVershireWhitingham
People
Population
4,453
4,843Highest
842Lowest
1,368
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-5.5%
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-7.9%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
-1%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
38.3±4.3Lowest
11% below VT
40.4±7.4
6% below VT
45.7±9.3
6% above VT
46.4±7.1Highest
8% above VT
Whitingham and Vershire are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
18.8%±6.4
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4Lowest
VT: 17.9%
19.1%±4.5
VT: 17.9%
19.8%±4.5Highest
VT: 17.9%
Whitingham and Vershire are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
20.7%±4.6Lowest
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2
VT: 21.4%
22.2%±5
VT: 21.4%
31.1%±2.3Highest
VT: 21.4%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
37.9%
VT: 43.8%
40.8%Highest
VT: 43.8%
31.8%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
32.8%
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
19.3%±1.8Highest
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5
VT: 7%
5.2%±2.6
VT: 7%
2.2%±1.9Lowest
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$73,854±$23k
9% below VT
$76,758±$6kHighest
5% below VT
$71,618±$12k
12% below VT
$70,625±$11kLowest
13% below VT
Randolph and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$224,800±$71k
29% below VT
$278,700±$38kHighest
12% below VT
$209,100±$55kLowest
34% below VT
$262,300±$30k
17% below VT
Randolph and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,137±$195
8% below VT
$1,172±$173Highest
5% below VT
$1,117±$80
9% below VT
$673±$150Lowest
45% below VT
Randolph and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,167Lowest
37% below VT
$4,698
7% below VT
$4,640
8% below VT
$5,055Highest
about the VT average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
67.7%±21.9
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8Lowest
VT: 48.4%
77.8%±24.5Highest
VT: 48.4%
62.7%±47.3
VT: 48.4%
Vershire and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
12.5%
VT: 10.1%
7.7%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
19.5%Highest
VT: 10.1%
15.5%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
79%
VT: 73.2%
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
81.5%
VT: 73.2%
85.2%Highest
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1974
2 yrs older than VT
1971Lowest
5 yrs older than VT
1985Highest
9 yrs newer than VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
19 minLowest
17% below VT
21 min
12% below VT
32 min
38% above VT
38 minHighest
62% above VT
Work from home
6.2%±3.9Lowest
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7Highest
VT: 16.9%
12.3%±4.1
VT: 16.9%
9.7%±5.2
VT: 16.9%
Randolph and Vershire are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #39 of 70 in VT #55 of 70 in VT — —
School district Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 — Twin Valley Unified School District #75
High school in town None in town Randolph Union High School — Twin Valley Middle High School
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.4Highest
—
7.8Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.