Compare towns

Castleton vs Randolph vs Ripton vs Warren

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Castleton has the most affordable homes ($225k median).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Ripton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+25.7%).
Warren has the most people working from home (36.2%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureCastletonRandolphRiptonWarren
People
Population
4,453
4,843Highest
508Lowest
1,585
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-5.5%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%
VT: +2.8%
+25.7%Highest
VT: +2.8%
+16%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
38.3±4.3Lowest
11% below VT
40.4±7.4
6% below VT
47.7±14.2
11% above VT
53.1±4.2Highest
23% above VT
Warren and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
18.8%±6.4Highest
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4
VT: 17.9%
11.8%±6.3
VT: 17.9%
9.3%±3.1Lowest
VT: 17.9%
Castleton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
20.7%±4.6Lowest
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2
VT: 21.4%
30.5%±7.1Highest
VT: 21.4%
30.1%±4.9
VT: 21.4%
Ripton and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
37.9%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
40.8%
VT: 43.8%
48%
VT: 43.8%
60%Highest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
19.3%±1.8
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5
VT: 7%
20.1%±6.3Highest
VT: 7%
3.6%±4Lowest
VT: 7%
Ripton and Castleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$73,854±$23kLowest
9% below VT
$76,758±$6k
5% below VT
$112,917±$15kHighest
39% above VT
$86,905±$16k
7% above VT
Ripton and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$224,800±$71kLowest
29% below VT
$278,700±$38k
12% below VT
$394,400±$61k
25% above VT
$569,300±$123kHighest
80% above VT
Warren and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,137±$195Lowest
8% below VT
$1,172±$173
5% below VT
—
$1,750±$394Highest
42% above VT
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,167Lowest
37% below VT
$4,698
7% below VT
$4,915
about the VT average
$7,284Highest
45% above VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
67.7%±21.9Highest
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8
VT: 48.4%
52.9%±100
VT: 48.4%
32.3%±26.6Lowest
VT: 48.4%
Castleton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
12.5%
VT: 10.1%
7.7%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
8.6%
VT: 10.1%
15.7%Highest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
79%
VT: 73.2%
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
90.9%Highest
VT: 73.2%
86.7%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1974
2 yrs older than VT
1971Lowest
5 yrs older than VT
1973
3 yrs older than VT
1977Highest
1 yr newer than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
19 min
17% below VT
21 min
12% below VT
24 minHighest
about the VT average
19 minLowest
21% below VT
Work from home
6.2%±3.9Lowest
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7
VT: 16.9%
17.2%±8.7
VT: 16.9%
36.2%±5Highest
VT: 16.9%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #39 of 70 in VT #55 of 70 in VT — —
School district Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 Harwood Unified Union School District #60
High school in town None in town Randolph Union High School None in town None in town
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.4
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.