Compare towns
Casco vs Otisfield vs Windham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Maine.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Casco has the most people working from home (26.6%).
Otisfield has the most affordable homes ($317k median).
Windham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+8.4%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Casco | Otisfield | Windham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,696 |
1,951Lowest |
19,188Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.6%Lowest ME: +2.6% |
+4.7% ME: +2.6% |
+8.4%Highest ME: +2.6% |
| Median age | 52±3.3 16% above ME |
56.8±4.8Highest 27% above ME |
41.8±1.8Lowest 7% below ME |
| Otisfield and Casco are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 11.3%±3.7Lowest ME: 18.1% |
16.1%±3.5 ME: 18.1% |
19.2%±2.7Highest ME: 18.1% |
| Windham and Otisfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 26.3%±7.8Highest ME: 22.4% |
23.7%±1.5 ME: 22.4% |
15.9%±2.1Lowest ME: 22.4% |
| Casco and Otisfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 32.9% ME: 36.2% |
31%Lowest ME: 36.2% |
44.2%Highest ME: 36.2% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.4%±2.5Highest ME: 5.8% |
1.9%±1.4Lowest ME: 5.8% |
3.9%±1.1 ME: 5.8% |
| Casco and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $69,313±$19kLowest 7% below ME |
$84,271±$15k 13% above ME |
$107,934±$14kHighest 44% above ME |
| Windham and Otisfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $355,500±$58k 20% above ME |
$317,200±$35kLowest 7% above ME |
$388,900±$22kHighest 31% above ME |
| Windham and Casco are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,395±$184Highest 22% above ME |
$1,300±$872 14% above ME |
$1,232±$332Lowest 8% above ME |
| Casco and Otisfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,085 about the ME average |
$2,652Lowest 13% below ME |
$3,938Highest 30% above ME |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 39.7%±35.5 ME: 48.4% |
77.3%±92.2Highest ME: 48.4% |
32.7%±14.7Lowest ME: 48.4% |
| Otisfield and Casco are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11%Highest ME: 10.7% |
10.3% ME: 10.7% |
3.4%Lowest ME: 10.7% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 90% ME: 74.3% |
92.3%Highest ME: 74.3% |
84.6%Lowest ME: 74.3% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1988 11 yrs newer than ME |
1990Highest 13 yrs newer than ME |
1985Lowest 8 yrs newer than ME |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 min 23% above ME |
33 minHighest 34% above ME |
26 minLowest 7% above ME |
| Work from home | 26.6%±10Highest ME: 15.9% |
18.8%±6.6Lowest ME: 15.9% |
19%±4.1 ME: 15.9% |
| Casco and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #95 of 133 in ME |
| School district | RSU 61/MSAD 61 | RSU 17/MSAD 17 | RSU 14 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Windham High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 12.1 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
ME average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.