Compare towns
Canaan vs Jericho vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Canaan has the most affordable homes ($254k median).
Jericho has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.9%).
Randolph has the shortest commute (21 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Canaan | Jericho | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,811Lowest |
5,114Highest |
4,843 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.9%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+1.9%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-0.1% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 44.4±3.7 14% above U.S. |
49.7±5.1Highest 28% above U.S. |
40.4±7.4Lowest 4% above U.S. |
| Jericho and Canaan are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.7%±4.6Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.5%±4.2Highest U.S.: 22% |
17.3%±4.4 U.S.: 22% |
| Jericho and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.1%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
20.2%±4.4 U.S.: 17.2% |
22.9%±4.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Randolph and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.2%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
65.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
40.8% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 7%±2.5 U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±1.6Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
11.2%±2.5Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Randolph and Canaan are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $81,583±$6k about the U.S. average |
$116,923±$16kHighest 45% above U.S. |
$76,758±$6kLowest 5% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $254,000±$26kLowest 24% below U.S. |
$493,100±$38kHighest 48% above U.S. |
$278,700±$38k 16% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,140±$90Lowest 19% below U.S. |
$1,731±$111Highest 23% above U.S. |
$1,172±$173 17% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,985 92% above U.S. |
$7,318Highest 135% above U.S. |
$4,698Lowest 51% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 74.4%±25.1 U.S.: 51.1% |
79.3%±52.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
54.1%±17.8Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Jericho and Canaan are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 13.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
0.9%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.7% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 77.3% U.S.: 65.2% |
92.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
67.2%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1975 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1983Highest 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 minHighest 14% above U.S. |
26 min about the U.S. average |
21 minLowest 22% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 14.9%±6 U.S.: 15.1% |
21.8%±6.4Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
12.9%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Jericho and Canaan are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #83 of 120 in NH | #6 of 70 in VT | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Mascoma Valley Regional School District | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | Mascoma Valley Regional High School | Mt. Mansfield Union High School | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.3 |
13.0Highest |
9.4Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.