Compare towns
Cambridge vs Underhill vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Cambridge has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.9%).
Underhill has the most people working from home (19.4%).
Randolph has the shortest commute (21 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Cambridge | Underhill | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,767 |
3,141Lowest |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+3.7% VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 37.4±1.8Lowest 13% below VT |
38.1±11.4 12% below VT |
40.4±7.4Highest 6% below VT |
| Randolph and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 23%±4.9 VT: 17.9% |
27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Cambridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 14.4%±3.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
17.6%±6 VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Randolph and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
50.1% VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.9%±1.2Lowest VT: 7% |
3.5%±2 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $72,344±$19kLowest 11% below VT |
$92,267±$54kHighest 14% above VT |
$76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
| Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $343,000±$38k 8% above VT |
$446,000±$24kHighest 41% above VT |
$278,700±$38kLowest 12% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,183±$66Highest 4% below VT |
— | $1,172±$173Lowest 5% below VT |
| Cambridge and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,910 about the VT average |
$6,697Highest 33% above VT |
$4,698Lowest 7% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 66.6%±7.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
| Cambridge and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.7% VT: 10.1% |
6.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 70.3% VT: 73.2% |
79.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1985Highest 9 yrs newer than VT |
1979 3 yrs newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 min 38% above VT |
33 minHighest 39% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
| Work from home | 9.9%±4.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
19.4%±11.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #25 of 70 in VT | #2 of 70 in VT | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Cambridge School District | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.