Compare towns
Cambridge vs Enfield vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Cambridge has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.9%).
Enfield has the oldest population (median age 58.3).
Randolph has the most affordable homes ($279k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Cambridge | Enfield | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,767Lowest |
4,475 |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.9%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-2.6%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
-0.1% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 37.4±1.8Lowest 4% below U.S. |
58.3±5.4Highest 50% above U.S. |
40.4±7.4 4% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 23%±4.9Highest U.S.: 22% |
7.9%±4.6Lowest U.S.: 22% |
17.3%±4.4 U.S.: 22% |
| Cambridge and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 14.4%±3.5Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
30.7%±7.6Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.9%±4.2 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Enfield and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.7%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
43% U.S.: 35.7% |
40.8%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.9%±1.2Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.7%±3.4 U.S.: 6.4% |
11.2%±2.5Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $72,344±$19kLowest 10% below U.S. |
$95,474±$19kHighest 18% above U.S. |
$76,758±$6k 5% below U.S. |
| Enfield and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $343,000±$38k 3% above U.S. |
$390,800±$71kHighest 17% above U.S. |
$278,700±$38kLowest 16% below U.S. |
| Enfield and Cambridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,183±$66Highest 16% below U.S. |
$1,181±$563 16% below U.S. |
$1,172±$173Lowest 17% below U.S. |
| Cambridge and Enfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,910 57% above U.S. |
$6,203Highest 99% above U.S. |
$4,698Lowest 51% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 66.6%±7.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
17.8%±16.7Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
54.1%±17.8 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Cambridge and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
16.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.7% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 70.3% U.S.: 65.2% |
82.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
67.2%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1985Highest 5 yrs newer than U.S. |
1983 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 23% above U.S. |
24 min 10% below U.S. |
21 minLowest 22% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 9.9%±4.1Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
11%±5.7 U.S.: 15.1% |
12.9%±4.7Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Randolph and Enfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #25 of 70 in VT | #5 of 120 in NH | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Cambridge School District | Mascoma Valley Regional School District | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.