Compare towns
Calais vs Randolph vs Sheldon
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Calais has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.4%).
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Sheldon has the most kids (23.7% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Calais | Randolph | Sheldon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,713Lowest |
4,843Highest |
2,267 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.4%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
-2.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42±8.6Highest about the VT average |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
40.9±3.5 5% below VT |
| Calais and Sheldon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 22.5%±5.4 VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
23.7%±3.6Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Sheldon and Calais are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 21.6%±5.2 VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
12.6%±2.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Randolph and Calais are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 55.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
14.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 7.4%±3.4 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2%±1.3Lowest VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Calais are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $100,625±$27kHighest 24% above VT |
$76,758±$6kLowest 5% below VT |
$78,533±$25k 3% below VT |
| Calais and Sheldon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $390,300±$36kHighest 23% above VT |
$278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$272,400±$61kLowest 14% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,408±$392Highest 14% above VT |
$1,172±$173Lowest 5% below VT |
$1,286±$379 4% above VT |
| Calais and Sheldon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,586Highest 31% above VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
$3,578Lowest 29% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 49%±38.3 VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
0%±27Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Calais are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
5.1%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.4%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
89% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1976 same as VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1984Highest 8 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 minHighest 32% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
25 min 7% above VT |
| Work from home | 23.4%±7.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
13%±3.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Calais and Sheldon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District #85 |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.