Compare towns
Buxton vs Lyman vs Poland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Maine.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Buxton has the highest household income ($100k).
Lyman has the oldest population (median age 53.8).
Poland has grown the fastest since 2010 (+9.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Buxton | Lyman | Poland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 8,512Highest |
4,612Lowest |
5,954 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.3% ME: +2.6% |
+4.2%Lowest ME: +2.6% |
+9.9%Highest ME: +2.6% |
| Median age | 45.5±3.9 about the ME average |
53.8±2Highest 20% above ME |
44.2±9.4Lowest about the ME average |
| Kids under 18 | 16.2%±3.6 ME: 18.1% |
15.2%±4Lowest ME: 18.1% |
21.4%±5.6Highest ME: 18.1% |
| Poland and Buxton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.2%±4.2 ME: 22.4% |
26.1%±6.4Highest ME: 22.4% |
17.8%±4.3Lowest ME: 22.4% |
| Lyman and Buxton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 30.3%Highest ME: 36.2% |
25.1% ME: 36.2% |
23.8%Lowest ME: 36.2% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.2%±1.8Highest ME: 5.8% |
3.3%±1.8Lowest ME: 5.8% |
4.2%±2.8Highest ME: 5.8% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $100,144±$21kHighest 34% above ME |
$87,284±$14k 17% above ME |
$85,557±$23kLowest 14% above ME |
| Buxton and Lyman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $356,800±$21k 20% above ME |
$360,400±$44kHighest 22% above ME |
$283,600±$44kLowest 4% below ME |
| Lyman and Buxton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,613±$266Highest 42% above ME |
$1,063±$522Lowest 7% below ME |
$1,198±$128 5% above ME |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,422Highest 13% above ME |
$2,717Lowest 11% below ME |
$2,774 9% below ME |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 26.9%±26.5Lowest ME: 48.4% |
37.7%±44.7 ME: 48.4% |
61.6%±30.7Highest ME: 48.4% |
| Poland and Lyman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 2.3%Lowest ME: 10.7% |
9% ME: 10.7% |
16.6%Highest ME: 10.7% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.3%Lowest ME: 74.3% |
95%Highest ME: 74.3% |
81.9% ME: 74.3% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 4 yrs newer than ME |
1979Lowest 2 yrs newer than ME |
1988Highest 11 yrs newer than ME |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 34 minHighest 39% above ME |
33 min 35% above ME |
28 minLowest 13% above ME |
| Work from home | 8.8%±3.1Lowest ME: 15.9% |
18.9%±6.9 ME: 15.9% |
21.9%±10.6Highest ME: 15.9% |
| Poland and Lyman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #104 of 133 in ME | #40 of 133 in ME | #81 of 133 in ME |
| School district | RSU 06/MSAD 06 | RSU 57/MSAD 57 | RSU 16 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Poland Regional H S |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 12.2 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
ME average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.