Compare towns
Burnham vs Prospect vs Stetson
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Maine.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Burnham has the most people working from home (17%).
Prospect has the most kids (25.2% under 18).
Stetson has grown the fastest since 2010 (-1.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Burnham | Prospect | Stetson |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 953 |
923Lowest |
1,151Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -5.8%Lowest ME: +2.6% |
-1.6% ME: +2.6% |
-1.3%Highest ME: +2.6% |
| Median age | 48.4±3.2Highest 8% above ME |
45.2±7.5 about the ME average |
42.2±5.1Lowest 6% below ME |
| Burnham and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 16.8%±4.7Lowest ME: 18.1% |
25.2%±10.7Highest ME: 18.1% |
22.4%±5.1 ME: 18.1% |
| Prospect and Stetson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.2%±3.1Highest ME: 22.4% |
19.8%±1.7 ME: 22.4% |
14.2%±3.1Lowest ME: 22.4% |
| Burnham and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 20.8% ME: 36.2% |
22.3%Highest ME: 36.2% |
19.8%Lowest ME: 36.2% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.7%±2.2 ME: 5.8% |
1.6%±1Lowest ME: 5.8% |
3.4%±2Highest ME: 5.8% |
| Stetson and Burnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $59,261±$18kLowest 21% below ME |
$81,250±$17kHighest 9% above ME |
$76,023±$28k about the ME average |
| Prospect and Stetson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $178,100±$43kLowest 40% below ME |
$196,500±$19k 34% below ME |
$205,700±$34kHighest 31% below ME |
| Stetson and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,308±$386Highest 15% above ME |
$1,107±$61 about the ME average |
$800±$377Lowest 30% below ME |
| Burnham and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $1,897Lowest 38% below ME |
$1,979Highest 35% below ME |
$1,962 35% below ME |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 60.9%±49 ME: 48.4% |
31.3%±42Lowest ME: 48.4% |
73.7%±42Highest ME: 48.4% |
| Stetson and Burnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 13.6%Highest ME: 10.7% |
7.3%Lowest ME: 10.7% |
10.4% ME: 10.7% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 87.8%Lowest ME: 74.3% |
88.8%Highest ME: 74.3% |
87.9% ME: 74.3% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983Lowest 6 yrs newer than ME |
1998Highest 21 yrs newer than ME |
1993 16 yrs newer than ME |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 minLowest 13% below ME |
33 minHighest 34% above ME |
32 min 29% above ME |
| Work from home | 17%±10.9Highest ME: 15.9% |
6.2%±3.3Lowest ME: 15.9% |
11%±5.6 ME: 15.9% |
| Burnham and Stetson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
ME average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.