Compare towns
Burke vs Cavendish vs Sunderland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Burke has the most people working from home (23.4%).
Cavendish has the shortest commute (19 min average).
Sunderland has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Burke | Cavendish | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,317Highest |
1,242Lowest |
1,269 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -5.8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.8% VT: +2.8% |
+10.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 41.1±4.8 5% below VT |
45.2±5.9Highest 5% above VT |
40.8±2.8Lowest 5% below VT |
| Cavendish and Burke are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 23%±4 VT: 17.9% |
18.3%±4.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
23.6%±5.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Sunderland and Burke are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 21.7%±2.2 VT: 21.4% |
23.6%±2Highest VT: 21.4% |
16.7%±2.7Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Cavendish and Burke are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 41.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
39.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
41.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±2.3 VT: 7% |
4.3%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
3.1%±3.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cavendish and Burke are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $87,143±$17kLowest 7% above VT |
$89,063±$29kHighest 10% above VT |
$88,523±$16k 9% above VT |
| Cavendish and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $340,600±$18kHighest 8% above VT |
$285,100±$40kLowest 10% below VT |
$300,000±$43k 5% below VT |
| Burke and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $938±$191Lowest 24% below VT |
$1,000±$546 19% below VT |
$1,413±$242Highest 15% above VT |
| Sunderland and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,177Highest about the VT average |
$3,948Lowest 22% below VT |
$4,136 18% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 74.6%±31Highest VT: 48.4% |
28.9%±27Lowest VT: 48.4% |
51.5%±61.5 VT: 48.4% |
| Burke and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10% VT: 10.1% |
6.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
11.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 88.6% VT: 73.2% |
81.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
91.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1968Lowest 8 yrs older than VT |
1973 3 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 minHighest 8% above VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
23 min 4% below VT |
| Work from home | 23.4%±6.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
18.5%±6.6 VT: 16.9% |
11.6%±5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Burke and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Kingdom East Unified Union School District #64 | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.