Compare towns
Brooklyn vs Danielson vs Durham vs Guilford
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Danielson has the most renters (47% rent).
Durham has the highest household income ($159k).
Guilford has the most expensive homes ($516k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Brooklyn | Danielson | Durham | Guilford |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 8,517 |
4,209Lowest |
7,208 |
22,108Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +2.6% CT: +0.9% |
— | — |
| Median age | 45.6±2.5 11% above CT |
34.5±3.6Lowest 16% below CT |
45.5±2.8 11% above CT |
51.1±1.9Highest 24% above CT |
| Kids under 18 | 20.6%±4.6 CT: 20.2% |
18.9%±6.1 CT: 20.2% |
16.4%±3.6Lowest CT: 20.2% |
20.8%±2.4Highest CT: 20.2% |
| Guilford and Brooklyn are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Age 65+ | 17.6%±2.9 CT: 18.5% |
13.6%±4.9Lowest CT: 18.5% |
17.4%±3.7 CT: 18.5% |
26.6%±2.7Highest CT: 18.5% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 23.9% CT: 42.5% |
11.5%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
47.9% CT: 42.5% |
60.6%Highest CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±1.7 CT: 7.1% |
9.2%±6.6Highest CT: 7.1% |
3.6%±1.5Lowest CT: 7.1% |
3.7%±1 CT: 7.1% |
| Danielson and Brooklyn are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $96,207±$15k about the CT average |
$64,050±$15kLowest 33% below CT |
$158,857±$7kHighest 66% above CT |
$137,816±$11k 44% above CT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $315,200±$28k 14% below CT |
$224,600±$13kLowest 39% below CT |
$424,800±$23k 16% above CT |
$515,800±$40kHighest 41% above CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,125±$98Lowest 24% below CT |
$1,235±$194 17% below CT |
$1,154±$448 22% below CT |
$1,717±$128Highest 15% above CT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,538 32% below CT |
$4,009Lowest 40% below CT |
$7,998 20% above CT |
$8,744Highest 32% above CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 38.5%±19.3Lowest CT: 52.6% |
44.7%±17.1 CT: 52.6% |
44.9%±28.4 CT: 52.6% |
47.4%±9Highest CT: 52.6% |
| Guilford and Durham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 2.3%Lowest CT: 10% |
21.1%Highest CT: 10% |
3.4% CT: 10% |
2.8% CT: 10% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 81.7% CT: 66.5% |
53%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
93.2%Highest CT: 66.5% |
83.7% CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1978Highest 11 yrs newer than CT |
1951Lowest 16 yrs older than CT |
1976 9 yrs newer than CT |
1974 7 yrs newer than CT |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min about the CT average |
28 minHighest 7% above CT |
23 minLowest 13% below CT |
26 min about the CT average |
| Work from home | 10.7%±5.4 CT: 16% |
6.6%±5.3Lowest CT: 16% |
20.5%±6.4 CT: 16% |
21.7%±3.3Highest CT: 16% |
| Guilford and Durham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Schools | ||||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #113 of 149 in CT | — | #88 of 149 in CT | #15 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Brooklyn School District | — | Regional School District 13 | Guilford School District |
| High school in town | None in town | — | Coginchaug Regional High School | Guilford High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 8.9Lowest |
11.8Highest |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.