Compare towns
Bridport vs Hooksett vs New Haven
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Bridport has the most affordable homes ($367k median).
Hooksett has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.6%).
New Haven has the most people working from home (17.8%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Bridport | Hooksett | New Haven |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,235Lowest |
15,057Highest |
1,792 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.6% U.S.: +7.4% |
+10.6%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-2.5%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 49.5±7.3Highest 27% above U.S. |
41.3±1.5Lowest 6% above U.S. |
48±3.9 23% above U.S. |
| Bridport and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 16.6%±5Lowest U.S.: 22% |
17.4%±2.9Highest U.S.: 22% |
17.1%±4.4 U.S.: 22% |
| Hooksett and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.3%±3.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.3%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.2%±2.4 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bridport and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 34.8% U.S.: 35.7% |
39.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
31.8%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.9%±1.3 U.S.: 6.4% |
8.9%±1.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
0.9%±0.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $83,214±$18kLowest 3% above U.S. |
$117,962±$11kHighest 46% above U.S. |
$92,321±$17k 14% above U.S. |
| Hooksett and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $367,200±$35kLowest 10% above U.S. |
$407,000±$26kHighest 22% above U.S. |
$379,300±$19k 14% above U.S. |
| Hooksett and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,184±$103 16% below U.S. |
$1,661±$206Highest 18% above U.S. |
$1,163±$143Lowest 18% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,519Lowest 77% above U.S. |
$6,554Highest 110% above U.S. |
$5,967 91% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 43.8%±51.6Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
41.7%±16.4 U.S.: 51.1% |
20.1%±6.7Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Bridport and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.4%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
3.3% U.S.: 12.5% |
3.1%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
80.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
78.2%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1978Lowest 2 yrs older than U.S. |
1988Highest 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
1981 1 yr newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 minHighest about the U.S. average |
27 min about the U.S. average |
22 minLowest 17% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 12.7%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.4%±3.1 U.S.: 15.1% |
17.8%±5.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| New Haven and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #30 of 120 in NH | — |
| School district | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 | Hooksett School District | Mt. Abraham Unified School District #61 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.


