Compare towns
Brandon vs Leicester vs Windham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Brandon has the most affordable homes ($228k median).
Leicester has the most homeowners (85.5%).
Windham has the most people working from home (20.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Brandon | Leicester | Windham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,120Highest |
1,026 |
594Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-10%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
— |
| Median age | 50.1±3.1Highest 16% above VT |
48.8±3.8 13% above VT |
44.2±7.4Lowest about the VT average |
| Brandon and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4.3Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.9%±5.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.5%±7.9 VT: 17.9% |
| Brandon and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.3%±4.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
24.5%±6.7Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.2%±8.1 VT: 21.4% |
| Leicester and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 32.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
35.9% VT: 43.8% |
48.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.5%±1.7Highest VT: 7% |
1.3%±1.6 VT: 7% |
0.8%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
| Brandon and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $64,180±$12kLowest 21% below VT |
$70,417±$30k 13% below VT |
$94,500±$12kHighest 16% above VT |
| Windham and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $227,800±$23kLowest 28% below VT |
$309,700±$107k about the VT average |
$353,900±$20kHighest 12% above VT |
| Windham and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,064±$225Lowest 14% below VT |
$1,098±$300Highest 11% below VT |
— |
| Leicester and Brandon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,241 16% below VT |
$3,822Lowest 24% below VT |
$5,951Highest 18% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41.7%±15.1Highest VT: 48.4% |
33.3%±40.4Lowest VT: 48.4% |
41.2%±94 VT: 48.4% |
| Brandon and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 14.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
11.8% VT: 10.1% |
9.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 84.3% VT: 73.2% |
85.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
82.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1951Lowest 25 yrs older than VT |
1981 5 yrs newer than VT |
1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 24 minLowest about the VT average |
28 minHighest 20% above VT |
27 min 14% above VT |
| Work from home | 9.9%±5.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.7%±5.9 VT: 16.9% |
20.5%±5.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Windham and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #69 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 | — | — |
| High school in town | Otter Valley Union High School | — | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.9 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.