Compare towns
Bourne vs Ashburnham vs Sagamore
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Bourne has the most renters (24.2% rent).
Ashburnham has the most affordable homes ($391k median).
Sagamore has grown the fastest since 2010 (+6.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Bourne | Ashburnham | Sagamore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 20,323Highest |
6,415 |
4,072Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.5%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+3.8% MA: +7.4% |
+6.3%Highest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 52±1.8Highest 30% above MA |
40.7±6.3Lowest about the MA average |
47.9±5.8 20% above MA |
| Bourne and Sagamore are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.7%±2.3Lowest MA: 19.4% |
22.6%±6Highest MA: 19.4% |
20%±5.3 MA: 19.4% |
| Ashburnham and Sagamore are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 29.8%±3.1Highest MA: 17.9% |
18.1%±4.5Lowest MA: 17.9% |
21.1%±4.5 MA: 17.9% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 46% MA: 47.3% |
44%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
48.9%Highest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.6%±1.6Highest MA: 7.9% |
5.6%±2.2 MA: 7.9% |
5%±3.7Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Bourne and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $91,058±$7kLowest 12% below MA |
$118,809±$11kHighest 14% above MA |
$108,315±$38k 4% above MA |
| Ashburnham and Sagamore are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $575,600±$28k about the MA average |
$390,700±$34kLowest 30% below MA |
$575,700±$56kHighest about the MA average |
| Sagamore and Bourne are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,379±$300Lowest 22% below MA |
$1,807±$1k about the MA average |
$2,123±$330Highest 20% above MA |
| Sagamore and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,485Lowest 25% below MA |
$6,046Highest about the MA average |
$4,796 20% below MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 62.8%±5.5Lowest MA: 51.8% |
100%±100Highest MA: 51.8% |
68.1%±73.9 MA: 51.8% |
| Ashburnham and Sagamore are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.2% MA: 10% |
6.8%Highest MA: 10% |
2.5%Lowest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 75.8%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
96%Highest MA: 62.5% |
84% MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1975Lowest 11 yrs newer than MA |
1981Highest 17 yrs newer than MA |
1979 15 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 26 minLowest 11% below MA |
32 minHighest 10% above MA |
26 min 10% below MA |
| Work from home | 14.9%±3.1Lowest MA: 18.6% |
16%±7.7 MA: 18.6% |
19.7%±6Highest MA: 18.6% |
| Sagamore and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #206 of 282 in MA | #178 of 282 in MA | — |
| School district | Bourne · Upper Cape Cod Regional Vocational Technical | Ashburnham-Westminster | — |
| High school in town | Upper Cape Cod Vocational Technical | None in town | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.8 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.