Compare towns
Bethlehem vs Orford vs Warner
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Bethlehem has the most people working from home (31.2%).
Orford has the most affordable homes ($272k median).
Warner has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.7%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Bethlehem | Orford | Warner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,537 |
1,295Lowest |
2,959Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.7%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
0% NH: +4.6% |
+3.7%Highest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 50.6±8.5Highest 17% above NH |
48.9±3.3 13% above NH |
43.7±4Lowest about the NH average |
| Bethlehem and Orford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.7%±5.4Highest NH: 18.2% |
12.3%±3.1Lowest NH: 18.2% |
17.3%±3.3 NH: 18.2% |
| Bethlehem and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.2%±5.5Highest NH: 20.1% |
25.5%±4.2 NH: 20.1% |
20.4%±3.5Lowest NH: 20.1% |
| Bethlehem and Orford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 45.1%Highest NH: 40.6% |
44% NH: 40.6% |
42.4%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.9%±0.9Lowest NH: 6% |
5%±2.1 NH: 6% |
5.3%±1.6Highest NH: 6% |
| Warner and Orford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $85,029±$18kLowest 14% below NH |
$92,571±$24k 7% below NH |
$94,022±$18kHighest 5% below NH |
| Warner and Orford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $288,300±$22k 28% below NH |
$271,900±$25kLowest 32% below NH |
$353,100±$22kHighest 12% below NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,174±$81Lowest 21% below NH |
$1,263±$686Highest 15% below NH |
$1,219±$123 18% below NH |
| Orford and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,418Lowest 19% below NH |
$5,836 12% below NH |
$7,650Highest 15% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41.3%±18.3 NH: 48.2% |
37.8%±10.7Lowest NH: 48.2% |
48.7%±21.3Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Warner and Bethlehem are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.1%Highest NH: 7.2% |
5.8%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
8.4% NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 75.3% NH: 72.8% |
75.5%Highest NH: 72.8% |
74.6%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1973 6 yrs older than NH |
1971Lowest 8 yrs older than NH |
1975Highest 4 yrs older than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 minLowest 24% below NH |
26 min 4% below NH |
32 minHighest 19% above NH |
| Work from home | 31.2%±12.9Highest NH: 16.8% |
10.8%±4.7Lowest NH: 16.8% |
16.6%±4.8 NH: 16.8% |
| Bethlehem and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #34 of 120 in NH | — | — |
| School district | Bethlehem School District · Profile School District | Rivendell Interstate School District | Kearsarge Regional School District |
| High school in town | Profile Senior High School | Rivendell Academy | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.9Lowest |
9.5Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.