Compare towns
Bethlehem vs Hampton vs Canterbury
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Bethlehem has the most people working from home (31.2%).
Hampton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.1%).
Canterbury has the highest household income ($129k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Bethlehem | Hampton | Canterbury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,537 |
16,426Highest |
2,353Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.7%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+5.1%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+1.6% NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 50.6±8.5 17% above NH |
55.8±2.1Highest 29% above NH |
48.6±3.8Lowest 12% above NH |
| Hampton and Bethlehem are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.7%±5.4Highest NH: 18.2% |
11.6%±2.3Lowest NH: 18.2% |
17.4%±4.4 NH: 18.2% |
| Bethlehem and Canterbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.2%±5.5 NH: 20.1% |
30.9%±2.8Highest NH: 20.1% |
22.9%±3.3Lowest NH: 20.1% |
| Hampton and Bethlehem are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 45.1% NH: 40.6% |
42.8%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
49.3%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.9%±0.9Lowest NH: 6% |
3.1%±1.1 NH: 6% |
6.8%±3Highest NH: 6% |
| Canterbury and Hampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $85,029±$18kLowest 14% below NH |
$95,233±$9k 4% below NH |
$129,333±$37kHighest 31% above NH |
| Canterbury and Hampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $288,300±$22kLowest 28% below NH |
$550,200±$39kHighest 37% above NH |
$443,700±$21k 10% above NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,174±$81Lowest 21% below NH |
$1,628±$94 9% above NH |
$2,136±$233Highest 43% above NH |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,418Lowest 19% below NH |
$6,813 about the NH average |
$7,421Highest 11% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41.3%±18.3Lowest NH: 48.2% |
56.8%±10.4 NH: 48.2% |
71.7%±48.3Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Canterbury and Hampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.1%Highest NH: 7.2% |
5.6% NH: 7.2% |
5.4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 75.3% NH: 72.8% |
73.8%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
93.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1973Lowest 6 yrs older than NH |
1978 1 yr older than NH |
1982Highest 3 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 minLowest 24% below NH |
26 min 3% below NH |
33 minHighest 22% above NH |
| Work from home | 31.2%±12.9Highest NH: 16.8% |
21.7%±3.3 NH: 16.8% |
21.6%±7.4Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Bethlehem and Hampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #34 of 120 in NH | #31 of 120 in NH | — |
| School district | Bethlehem School District · Profile School District | Hampton School District · Winnacunnet Cooperative School District | Shaker Regional School District |
| High school in town | Profile Senior High School | Winnacunnet High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.9Lowest |
10.1Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.