Compare towns
Bethel vs Pawlet vs Randolph
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Bethel has the most affordable homes ($238k median).
Pawlet has the most people working from home (20.4%).
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.1%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Bethel | Pawlet | Randolph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,736 |
1,480Lowest |
4,843Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-3.6% VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.7±3.7Highest 18% above VT |
47.9±7.5 11% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
| Bethel and Pawlet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 11.4%±3.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
20.3%±5.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Pawlet and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 25.5%±3.7 VT: 21.4% |
27.3%±2.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Pawlet and Bethel are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 35.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
37.5% VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.3%±1.6Lowest VT: 7% |
4.4%±2.9 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $75,822±$7k 7% below VT |
$62,273±$14kLowest 23% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
| Randolph and Bethel are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $238,000±$41kLowest 25% below VT |
$266,200±$44k 16% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
| Randolph and Pawlet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,335±$220Highest 8% above VT |
$1,153±$215Lowest 7% below VT |
$1,172±$173 5% below VT |
| Bethel and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,168Highest about the VT average |
$3,924Lowest 22% below VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54%±22 VT: 48.4% |
42.6%±21.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Bethel are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.2% VT: 10.1% |
10%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 83.6% VT: 73.2% |
87.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1966 10 yrs older than VT |
1964Lowest 12 yrs older than VT |
1971Highest 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 min 19% above VT |
33 minHighest 40% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
| Work from home | 7.1%±3.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
20.4%±8.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Pawlet and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #55 of 70 in VT |
| School district | White River Unified School District #79 | Mettawee School District #84 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.