Compare towns

Bartlett vs Rumney vs Sutton vs Wolfeboro

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Bartlett has grown the fastest since 2010 (+14.8%).
Rumney has the most affordable homes ($310k median).
Sutton has the highest household income ($130k).
Wolfeboro has the most people working from home (22.9%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureBartlettRumneySuttonWolfeboro
People
Population
3,281
1,458Lowest
2,239
6,571Highest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+14.8%Highest
NH: +4.6%
+1.2%Lowest
NH: +4.6%
+7.7%
NH: +4.6%
+2.3%
NH: +4.6%
Median age
57.4±4.7Highest
33% above NH
44.5±2.3Lowest
about the NH average
48.1±4.1
11% above NH
57±1.8
32% above NH
Bartlett and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
7.5%±2.7Lowest
NH: 18.2%
18.7%±4.3
NH: 18.2%
20.5%±3.8Highest
NH: 18.2%
13.7%±3.3
NH: 18.2%
Sutton and Rumney are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
36.1%±9.6Highest
NH: 20.1%
24.1%±3.7
NH: 20.1%
21.6%±5.9Lowest
NH: 20.1%
34.6%±5.2
NH: 20.1%
Bartlett and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
36.4%Lowest
NH: 40.6%
41.9%
NH: 40.6%
44.3%
NH: 40.6%
45%Highest
NH: 40.6%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
0.1%±0.4Lowest
NH: 6%
4.9%±2.3Highest
NH: 6%
4.9%±3.6Highest
NH: 6%
2.8%±1.8
NH: 6%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$59,754±$9kLowest
40% below NH
$79,444±$21k
20% below NH
$130,313±$31kHighest
32% above NH
$94,375±$22k
5% below NH
Sutton and Wolfeboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$371,400±$78k
8% below NH
$309,800±$37kLowest
23% below NH
$362,600±$16k
10% below NH
$546,500±$60kHighest
36% above NH
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,676±$97Highest
12% above NH
$1,064±$100Lowest
29% below NH
$1,656±$614
11% above NH
$1,103±$76
26% below NH
Bartlett and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$2,512Lowest
62% below NH
$4,716
29% below NH
$7,652Highest
15% above NH
$4,531
32% below NH
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
68.5%±37.9Highest
NH: 48.2%
48.1%±21.3
NH: 48.2%
27.6%±47.2
NH: 48.2%
12%±11.6Lowest
NH: 48.2%
Bartlett and Rumney are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
10.5%Highest
NH: 7.2%
10.4%
NH: 7.2%
4.8%Lowest
NH: 7.2%
8.2%
NH: 7.2%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
79%
NH: 72.8%
77.8%Lowest
NH: 72.8%
95.7%Highest
NH: 72.8%
78.1%
NH: 72.8%
Typical home builtmedian year
1982Highest
3 yrs newer than NH
1976
3 yrs older than NH
1971Lowest
8 yrs older than NH
1982Highest
3 yrs newer than NH
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
31 min
15% above NH
33 minHighest
22% above NH
29 min
10% above NH
24 minLowest
11% below NH
Work from home
13.5%±7.1Lowest
NH: 16.8%
14.4%±7
NH: 16.8%
14.8%±5.6
NH: 16.8%
22.9%±6.6Highest
NH: 16.8%
Wolfeboro and Sutton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #74 of 120 in NH — — #46 of 120 in NH
School district Bartlett School District Rumney School District Kearsarge Regional School District Governor Wentworth Regional School District
High school in town None in town None in town Kearsarge Regional High School Kingswood Regional High School
Students per teacherat that high school — —
10.4Lowest
11.1Highest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.