Compare towns
Barrington vs Concord vs Mapleton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barrington has grown the fastest since 2010 (+8.7%).
Concord has the most renters (43.2% rent).
Mapleton has the most affordable homes ($192k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barrington | Concord | Mapleton |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 9,489 |
44,375Highest |
1,884Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +8.7%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+3% U.S.: +7.4% |
-3.2%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 38.7±2.3Lowest about the U.S. average |
40.7±1.3 5% above U.S. |
41.8±6Highest 7% above U.S. |
| Mapleton and Concord are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 23.7%±4Highest U.S.: 22% |
17.2%±1.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
22.2%±5.1 U.S.: 22% |
| Barrington and Mapleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 15.6%±2.7Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
18.7%±1.5Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
18.3%±3.1 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Concord and Mapleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.4%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
42.3% U.S.: 35.7% |
34.3%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.3%±1.9 U.S.: 6.4% |
6%±0.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
5%±2.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Concord and Barrington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $110,323±$14kHighest 37% above U.S. |
$84,902±$5kLowest 5% above U.S. |
$91,731±$25k 14% above U.S. |
| Barrington and Mapleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $399,100±$30kHighest 20% above U.S. |
$350,900±$13k 5% above U.S. |
$191,800±$23kLowest 42% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,867±$194Highest 32% above U.S. |
$1,441±$43 about the U.S. average |
$610±$277Lowest 57% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,121 128% above U.S. |
$7,227Highest 132% above U.S. |
$1,789Lowest 43% below U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 63.1%±25.2Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
44.1%±5.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
16.7%±10.5Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Barrington and Concord are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.1%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
8.9%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
8.9%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 87%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
56.8%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
79.9% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1987Highest 7 yrs newer than U.S. |
1969Lowest 11 yrs older than U.S. |
1977 3 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 minHighest 14% above U.S. |
23 minLowest 13% below U.S. |
28 min 5% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 18.7%±4.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
14.1%±1.8 U.S.: 15.1% |
10.8%±3.8Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Barrington and Concord are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #65 of 120 in NH | #89 of 120 in NH | — |
| School district | Barrington School District | Concord School District · Merrimack Valley School District | RSU 79/MSAD 01 |
| High school in town | None in town | Concord High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 13.0 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.