Compare towns
Barre vs Windsor vs Westminster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barre has the shortest commute (19 min average).
Windsor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+0.2%).
Westminster has the most people working from home (27%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barre | Windsor | Westminster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 8,412Highest |
3,554 |
2,999Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -6.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+0.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-5.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.2±6.6Lowest about the VT average |
44.8±6.5 4% above VT |
53.5±3.7Highest 24% above VT |
| Westminster and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 13.5%±3.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±5.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
18.2%±4.7 VT: 17.9% |
| Windsor and Westminster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.4%±3.9Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.7%±6.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
27.6%±6.8 VT: 21.4% |
| Windsor and Westminster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 36.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
39.7% VT: 43.8% |
46.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.4%±1.9 VT: 7% |
0.7%±0.8Lowest VT: 7% |
4.4%±3.1Highest VT: 7% |
| Westminster and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $65,625±$7k 19% below VT |
$52,484±$11kLowest 35% below VT |
$71,491±$4kHighest 12% below VT |
| Westminster and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $210,400±$15k 34% below VT |
$207,500±$31kLowest 34% below VT |
$273,800±$35kHighest 14% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,093±$58Highest 11% below VT |
$1,026±$89 17% below VT |
$916±$126Lowest 26% below VT |
| Barre and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,192 3% above VT |
$5,209Highest 3% above VT |
$4,063Lowest 19% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 34.4%±10.3 VT: 48.4% |
31.5%±17Lowest VT: 48.4% |
49.2%±7.5Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Westminster and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 17.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
8.8% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 50.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
57.8% VT: 73.2% |
88.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1947 29 yrs older than VT |
1945Lowest 31 yrs older than VT |
1980Highest 4 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 minLowest 21% below VT |
23 min 3% below VT |
24 minHighest about the VT average |
| Work from home | 10.5%±4.1 VT: 16.9% |
10.3%±5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
27%±6.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #19 of 70 in VT | #61 of 70 in VT | #53 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Barre Unified Union School District #97 · Central Vermont Career Center | — | Bellows Falls Union High School District #27 · Westminster School District |
| High school in town | Spaulding Union High School | — | Bellows Falls Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.7Highest |
— | 10.6Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.

