Compare towns
Barre vs Dummerston vs Rutland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barre has the most renters (49.6% rent).
Dummerston has the most people working from home (25.9%).
Rutland has the shortest commute (16 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barre | Dummerston | Rutland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 8,412 |
2,090Lowest |
15,712Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -6.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-4.2% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.2±6.6Lowest about the VT average |
45.6±11.7 6% above VT |
49±2.1Highest 14% above VT |
| Rutland and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 13.5%±3.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.7%±6Highest VT: 17.9% |
15.5%±2.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Dummerston and Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.4%±3.9Lowest VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±3 VT: 21.4% |
26.2%±3.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Rutland and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 36.1% VT: 43.8% |
58.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
33.4%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.4%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
1.3%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
2.2%±0.8 VT: 7% |
| Barre and Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $65,625±$7k 19% below VT |
$101,696±$21kHighest 25% above VT |
$57,675±$8kLowest 29% below VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $210,400±$15k 34% below VT |
$335,300±$22kHighest 6% above VT |
$185,500±$16kLowest 41% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,093±$58 11% below VT |
$1,392±$126Highest 13% above VT |
$995±$65Lowest 19% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,192Highest 3% above VT |
$4,536Lowest 10% below VT |
$4,657 8% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 34.4%±10.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
44.1%±32.2 VT: 48.4% |
51.6%±8.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Rutland and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 17.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
4.5%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
15.3% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 50.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
92.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
54.9% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1947 29 yrs older than VT |
1971Highest 5 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 min 21% below VT |
21 minHighest 11% below VT |
16 minLowest 32% below VT |
| Work from home | 10.5%±4.1 VT: 16.9% |
25.9%±10.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
8.1%±2.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #19 of 70 in VT | — | #51 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Barre Unified Union School District #97 · Central Vermont Career Center | Windham Southeast Unified Union School District #96 | Rutland City School District |
| High school in town | Spaulding Union High School | None in town | Rutland Senior High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.7Lowest |
— | 12.3Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.