Compare towns
Barre vs Oakham vs Warren
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barre has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.4%).
Oakham has the most homeowners (91.6%).
Warren has the most affordable homes ($334k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barre | Oakham | Warren |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,572Highest |
1,639Lowest |
5,009 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.4%Highest MA: +7.4% |
-2.7% MA: +7.4% |
-3.1%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.8±8.5 9% above MA |
49±2.3Highest 23% above MA |
38.7±7.3Lowest 3% below MA |
| Oakham and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.8%±5.4Lowest MA: 19.4% |
18.2%±3.1 MA: 19.4% |
20.8%±8Highest MA: 19.4% |
| Warren and Oakham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19%±5.6 MA: 17.9% |
21.4%±2.3Highest MA: 17.9% |
14.6%±4.5Lowest MA: 17.9% |
| Oakham and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 31.6% MA: 47.3% |
40.3%Highest MA: 47.3% |
23.2%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±3.2Highest MA: 7.9% |
3.8%±2.1 MA: 7.9% |
2.9%±2.1Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Barre and Oakham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $107,727±$13kHighest 4% above MA |
$102,000±$20k about the MA average |
$66,082±$6kLowest 36% below MA |
| Barre and Oakham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $394,300±$55k 30% below MA |
$420,100±$20kHighest 25% below MA |
$333,700±$35kLowest 41% below MA |
| Oakham and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,030±$713 42% below MA |
$1,174±$81Highest 33% below MA |
$890±$174Lowest 49% below MA |
| Oakham and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,163Highest 14% below MA |
$4,103Lowest 32% below MA |
$4,530 24% below MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 38.2%±27.5Highest MA: 51.8% |
27.8%±69.1Lowest MA: 51.8% |
29.7%±18.4 MA: 51.8% |
| Barre and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.2% MA: 10% |
4.4%Lowest MA: 10% |
9%Highest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 75.8% MA: 62.5% |
91.6%Highest MA: 62.5% |
64.5%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 7 yrs newer than MA |
1979Highest 15 yrs newer than MA |
1975 11 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 36 min 24% above MA |
39 minHighest 32% above MA |
33 minLowest 13% above MA |
| Work from home | 11.2%±4.6Highest MA: 18.6% |
9.6%±3.8 MA: 18.6% |
8.5%±5.4Lowest MA: 18.6% |
| Barre and Oakham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #134 of 282 in MA | — | #165 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Quabbin | Quabbin | Quaboag Regional |
| High school in town | Quabbin Regional High School | None in town | Quaboag Regional High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.9Highest |
— | 10.0Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.