Compare towns
Barnet vs Whitingham vs West Rutland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barnet has the most kids (21.6% under 18).
Whitingham has grown the fastest since 2010 (-1%).
West Rutland has the shortest commute (22 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barnet | Whitingham | West Rutland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,855 |
1,368Lowest |
2,240Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.6% VT: +2.8% |
-1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-4.8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.7±5.3 11% above VT |
46.4±7.1Lowest 8% above VT |
47.8±5.1Highest 11% above VT |
| West Rutland and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.6%±4.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
17.2%±4.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Barnet and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.8%±3.8 VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.8%±5.9Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 35.6%Highest VT: 43.8% |
32.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
35.2% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
1.9%±2.1 VT: 7% |
| Whitingham and West Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $67,386±$15k 17% below VT |
$70,625±$11kHighest 13% below VT |
$61,161±$27kLowest 25% below VT |
| Whitingham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $247,900±$24k 22% below VT |
$262,300±$30kHighest 17% below VT |
$196,400±$27kLowest 38% below VT |
| Whitingham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $974±$72Highest 21% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$883±$151 28% below VT |
| Barnet and West Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,489 11% below VT |
$5,055Highest about the VT average |
$3,498Lowest 31% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 59.3%±29.9Lowest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
60.1%±22.2 VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and West Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.2% VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
81.6% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 min 17% above VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
22 minLowest 9% below VT |
| Work from home | 13.3%±4.5 VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
13.6%±4.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
| West Rutland and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Caledonia Cooperative Unified School District #78 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | — |
| High school in town | None in town | Twin Valley Middle High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 7.8 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.