Compare towns
Barnet vs Peacham vs Underhill
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barnet has the most affordable homes ($248k median).
Peacham has the most people working from home (24.2%).
Underhill has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.7%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barnet | Peacham | Underhill |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,855 |
887Lowest |
3,141Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.6%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-2.3% VT: +2.8% |
+3.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.7±5.3 11% above VT |
50.1±5.7Highest 16% above VT |
38.1±11.4Lowest 12% below VT |
| Peacham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.6%±4.9 VT: 17.9% |
20.7%±6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
27.8%±10.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Underhill and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.8%±3.8 VT: 21.4% |
33.6%±2.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
17.6%±6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Peacham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 35.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
48.9% VT: 43.8% |
50.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
5.4%±4Highest VT: 7% |
3.5%±2 VT: 7% |
| Peacham and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $67,386±$15kLowest 17% below VT |
$90,000±$28k 11% above VT |
$92,267±$54kHighest 14% above VT |
| Underhill and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $247,900±$24kLowest 22% below VT |
$302,000±$64k 5% below VT |
$446,000±$24kHighest 41% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $974±$72Lowest 21% below VT |
$1,028±$248Highest 17% below VT |
— |
| Peacham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,489Lowest 11% below VT |
$5,605 11% above VT |
$6,697Highest 33% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 59.3%±29.9 VT: 48.4% |
66.7%±17.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
0%±18.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Peacham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.2% VT: 10.1% |
10.6%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
76.1%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
79.8% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Lowest 2 yrs older than VT |
1976 same as VT |
1979Highest 3 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minLowest 17% above VT |
31 min 31% above VT |
33 minHighest 39% above VT |
| Work from home | 13.3%±4.5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
24.2%±16.9Highest VT: 16.9% |
19.4%±11.3 VT: 16.9% |
| Peacham and Underhill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #2 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Caledonia Cooperative Unified School District #78 | Peacham School District | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.