Compare towns
Barnet vs Charlotte vs Jericho
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barnet has the most affordable homes ($248k median).
Charlotte has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barnet | Charlotte | Jericho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,855Lowest |
3,916 |
5,114Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.6%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+4.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+1.9% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.7±5.3Lowest 11% above VT |
52.2±5Highest 21% above VT |
49.7±5.1 15% above VT |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.6%±4.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.6%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Barnet and Charlotte are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.8%±3.8Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.3%±5.2 VT: 21.4% |
20.2%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Barnet and Charlotte are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 35.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
66.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
65.3% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
1.4%±1.2 VT: 7% |
2.4%±1.6Highest VT: 7% |
| Jericho and Charlotte are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $67,386±$15kLowest 17% below VT |
$144,375±$27kHighest 78% above VT |
$116,923±$16k 44% above VT |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $247,900±$24kLowest 22% below VT |
$695,300±$53kHighest 120% above VT |
$493,100±$38k 56% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $974±$72Lowest 21% below VT |
$1,738±$803Highest 41% above VT |
$1,731±$111 40% above VT |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,489Lowest 11% below VT |
$9,221Highest 83% above VT |
$7,318 45% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 59.3%±29.9 VT: 48.4% |
56.1%±28.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
79.3%±52.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Jericho and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
3.7% VT: 10.1% |
0.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
95.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
92.9% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Lowest 2 yrs older than VT |
1982 6 yrs newer than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minHighest 17% above VT |
25 minLowest 7% above VT |
26 min 10% above VT |
| Work from home | 13.3%±4.5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
29.8%±8.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
21.8%±6.4 VT: 16.9% |
| Charlotte and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #3 of 70 in VT | #6 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Caledonia Cooperative Unified School District #78 | Champlain Valley Unified Union School District #56 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Mt. Mansfield Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 13.0 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.