Compare towns
Barnet vs Cavendish vs Dummerston
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barnet has the most affordable homes ($248k median).
Cavendish has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.8%).
Dummerston has the most people working from home (25.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barnet | Cavendish | Dummerston |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,855 |
1,242Lowest |
2,090Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.6%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+0.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.7±5.3Highest 11% above VT |
45.2±5.9Lowest 5% above VT |
45.6±11.7 6% above VT |
| Barnet and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.6%±4.9 VT: 17.9% |
18.3%±4.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.7%±6Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Dummerston and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.8%±3.8Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.6%±2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±3 VT: 21.4% |
| Barnet and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 35.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
39.3% VT: 43.8% |
58.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
4.3%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
1.3%±1.1 VT: 7% |
| Cavendish and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $67,386±$15kLowest 17% below VT |
$89,063±$29k 10% above VT |
$101,696±$21kHighest 25% above VT |
| Dummerston and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $247,900±$24kLowest 22% below VT |
$285,100±$40k 10% below VT |
$335,300±$22kHighest 6% above VT |
| Dummerston and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $974±$72Lowest 21% below VT |
$1,000±$546 19% below VT |
$1,392±$126Highest 13% above VT |
| Dummerston and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,489 11% below VT |
$3,948Lowest 22% below VT |
$4,536Highest 10% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 59.3%±29.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
28.9%±27Lowest VT: 48.4% |
44.1%±32.2 VT: 48.4% |
| Barnet and Dummerston are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.3% VT: 10.1% |
4.5%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 79.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
81.3% VT: 73.2% |
92.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
1968Lowest 8 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minHighest 17% above VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
21 min 11% below VT |
| Work from home | 13.3%±4.5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
18.5%±6.6 VT: 16.9% |
25.9%±10.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Dummerston and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Caledonia Cooperative Unified School District #78 | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 | Windham Southeast Unified Union School District #96 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.