Compare towns
Barnet vs Randolph vs Brunswick
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Barnet has the most people working from home (55%).
Randolph has the youngest population (median age 40.4).
Brunswick has the highest household income ($128k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Barnet | Randolph | Brunswick |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 61Lowest |
4,843Highest |
109 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | -0.1% VT: +2.8% |
— |
| Median age | 62.2±45.8Highest 44% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
57.5±13.8 33% above VT |
| Barnet and Brunswick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 31.1%±29.6Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
23.9%±24.5 VT: 17.9% |
| Barnet and Brunswick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 36.1%±44.4 VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
39.4%±25.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Brunswick and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 59.5%Highest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
35.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0%±23.2Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
3.7%±11 VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Brunswick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $57,917±$16kLowest 29% below VT |
$76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$128,125±$33kHighest 58% above VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $204,200±$38kLowest 36% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$228,100±$52k 28% below VT |
| Randolph and Brunswick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | — | $1,172±$173 5% below VT |
— |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,950 41% below VT |
$4,698Highest 7% below VT |
$2,472Lowest 51% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | — | 54.1%±17.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
100%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Brunswick and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 47.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
4.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 100%Highest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
95.1% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
1976Highest same as VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | — | 21 minLowest 12% below VT |
41 minHighest 76% above VT |
| Work from home | 55%±29Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
10.5%±15.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — |
| High school in town | — | Randolph Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.