Compare towns
Ashby vs North Hampton vs Lunenburg
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Ashby has the most affordable homes ($391k median).
North Hampton has the most people working from home (25.9%).
Lunenburg has grown the fastest since 2010 (+16.8%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Ashby | North Hampton | Lunenburg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,211Lowest |
4,543 |
11,902Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.9%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+5.5% U.S.: +7.4% |
+16.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 50.5±3Highest 30% above U.S. |
50.5±3.3Highest 30% above U.S. |
43.2±2.1Lowest 11% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 17%±3.5Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.2%±5.4 U.S.: 22% |
21.1%±3Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Lunenburg and North Hampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 21.5%±4.3 U.S.: 17.2% |
26%±4.9Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.9%±2.7Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| North Hampton and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 43.7%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
54.5%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
44% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±1.2 U.S.: 6.4% |
2.5%±1.5Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.2%±1.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Lunenburg and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $115,598±$9k 43% above U.S. |
$146,458±$29kHighest 81% above U.S. |
$112,828±$11kLowest 40% above U.S. |
| North Hampton and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $390,500±$30kLowest 17% above U.S. |
$670,400±$61kHighest 102% above U.S. |
$463,900±$24k 39% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,200±$484Lowest 15% below U.S. |
$1,805±$106 28% above U.S. |
$1,974±$586Highest 40% above U.S. |
| Lunenburg and North Hampton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,034Lowest 93% above U.S. |
$8,529Highest 173% above U.S. |
$6,401 105% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 36.4%±53.5 U.S.: 51.1% |
23.5%±21Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
45.8%±13.5Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lunenburg and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 2.6%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
2.9% U.S.: 12.5% |
4.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 95.5%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
91.3% U.S.: 65.2% |
80.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1970Lowest 10 yrs older than U.S. |
1984Highest 4 yrs newer than U.S. |
1972 8 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 min 25% above U.S. |
25 minLowest 7% below U.S. |
36 minHighest 37% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 17.8%±5.8 U.S.: 15.1% |
25.9%±6.9Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
15.8%±3.5Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| North Hampton and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #200 of 282 in MA | #12 of 120 in NH | #87 of 282 in MA |
| School district | North Middlesex | North Hampton School District | Lunenburg |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Lunenburg High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 12.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | 5 photos → | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.