Compare towns
Ashby vs Hardwick vs Ashburnham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Ashby has the oldest population (median age 50.5).
Hardwick has the most renters (31.8% rent).
Ashburnham has the most kids (22.6% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Ashby | Hardwick | Ashburnham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,211 |
2,684Lowest |
6,415Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.9%Highest MA: +7.4% |
-10.8%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+3.8% MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 50.5±3Highest 26% above MA |
45.3±9.8 13% above MA |
40.7±6.3Lowest about the MA average |
| Ashby and Hardwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17%±3.5Lowest MA: 19.4% |
20.5%±5.6 MA: 19.4% |
22.6%±6Highest MA: 19.4% |
| Ashburnham and Hardwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 21.5%±4.3 MA: 17.9% |
22.7%±5Highest MA: 17.9% |
18.1%±4.5Lowest MA: 17.9% |
| Hardwick and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 43.7% MA: 47.3% |
30.9%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
44%Highest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±1.2Lowest MA: 7.9% |
6.2%±4.4Highest MA: 7.9% |
5.6%±2.2 MA: 7.9% |
| Hardwick and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $115,598±$9k 11% above MA |
$75,000±$22kLowest 28% below MA |
$118,809±$11kHighest 14% above MA |
| Ashburnham and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $390,500±$30k 31% below MA |
$346,700±$67kLowest 38% below MA |
$390,700±$34kHighest 30% below MA |
| Ashburnham and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,200±$484 32% below MA |
$1,108±$119Lowest 37% below MA |
$1,807±$1kHighest about the MA average |
| Ashburnham and Ashby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,034 about the MA average |
$4,400Lowest 27% below MA |
$6,046Highest about the MA average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 36.4%±53.5Lowest MA: 51.8% |
59%±13.8 MA: 51.8% |
100%±100Highest MA: 51.8% |
| Ashburnham and Hardwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 2.6%Lowest MA: 10% |
11%Highest MA: 10% |
6.8% MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 95.5% MA: 62.5% |
68.2%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
96%Highest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1970 6 yrs newer than MA |
1968Lowest 4 yrs newer than MA |
1981Highest 17 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 13% above MA |
31 minLowest 7% above MA |
32 min 10% above MA |
| Work from home | 17.8%±5.8Highest MA: 18.6% |
8.7%±4.3Lowest MA: 18.6% |
16%±7.7 MA: 18.6% |
| Ashby and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #200 of 282 in MA | #163 of 282 in MA | #178 of 282 in MA |
| School district | North Middlesex | Quabbin | Ashburnham-Westminster |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.