Compare towns
Ashburnham vs Rutland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Ashburnham has the most affordable homes ($391k median).
Rutland has grown the fastest since 2010 (+13.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Ashburnham | Rutland |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 6,415Lowest |
9,353Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.8%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+13.5%Highest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 40.7±6.3Lowest about the MA average |
41.4±2.5Highest 4% above MA |
| Rutland and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Kids under 18 | 22.6%±6Lowest MA: 19.4% |
26.4%±5.4Highest MA: 19.4% |
| Rutland and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 18.1%±4.5Highest MA: 17.9% |
14.7%±2.6Lowest MA: 17.9% |
| Ashburnham and Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 44%Highest MA: 47.3% |
42%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.6%±2.2 MA: 7.9% |
5.6%±2.3 MA: 7.9% |
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $118,809±$11kLowest 14% above MA |
$145,707±$28kHighest 40% above MA |
| Rutland and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $390,700±$34kLowest 30% below MA |
$462,800±$33kHighest 18% below MA |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,807±$1kHighest about the MA average |
$1,078±$170Lowest 39% below MA |
| Ashburnham and Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,046Highest about the MA average |
$5,657Lowest 6% below MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 100%±100Highest MA: 51.8% |
47.8%±26.7Lowest MA: 51.8% |
| Ashburnham and Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 6.8%Highest MA: 10% |
2.1%Lowest MA: 10% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 96%Highest MA: 62.5% |
89.4%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Lowest 17 yrs newer than MA |
1990Highest 26 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minLowest 10% above MA |
37 minHighest 27% above MA |
| Work from home | 16%±7.7Lowest MA: 18.6% |
16.1%±5Highest MA: 18.6% |
| Rutland and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #178 of 282 in MA | #150 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Ashburnham-Westminster | Wachusett |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.
