Compare towns
Ashburnham vs Gardner vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Ashburnham has the most kids (22.6% under 18).
Gardner has the most renters (41.1% rent).
Windsor has the most people working from home (21.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Ashburnham | Gardner | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 6,415 |
21,148Highest |
1,065Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.8% MA: +7.4% |
+5.2%Highest MA: +7.4% |
-7.6%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 40.7±6.3Lowest about the MA average |
43.7±2.3 9% above MA |
44.8±6.4Highest 12% above MA |
| Windsor and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 22.6%±6Highest MA: 19.4% |
18.3%±2.3 MA: 19.4% |
15.8%±5.1Lowest MA: 19.4% |
| Ashburnham and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 18.1%±4.5Lowest MA: 17.9% |
19.6%±2.2Highest MA: 17.9% |
18.6%±4.9 MA: 17.9% |
| Gardner and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 44%Highest MA: 47.3% |
23.8%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
41.5% MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.6%±2.2Highest MA: 7.9% |
4.6%±1.3 MA: 7.9% |
2.7%±1.7Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Ashburnham and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $118,809±$11kHighest 14% above MA |
$67,518±$8kLowest 35% below MA |
$115,563±$10k 11% above MA |
| Ashburnham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $390,700±$34kHighest 30% below MA |
$301,600±$20kLowest 46% below MA |
$389,700±$32k 31% below MA |
| Ashburnham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,807±$1kHighest about the MA average |
$1,109±$51Lowest 37% below MA |
— |
| Ashburnham and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,046Highest about the MA average |
$4,150 31% below MA |
$3,867Lowest 35% below MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 100%±100Highest MA: 51.8% |
49.7%±8.6 MA: 51.8% |
0%±100Lowest MA: 51.8% |
| Ashburnham and Gardner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.8% MA: 10% |
13.7%Highest MA: 10% |
3.8%Lowest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 96% MA: 62.5% |
58.9%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
96.2%Highest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 17 yrs newer than MA |
1954Lowest 10 yrs older than MA |
1970 6 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 min 10% above MA |
31 minLowest 5% above MA |
37 minHighest 27% above MA |
| Work from home | 16%±7.7 MA: 18.6% |
13.3%±3.6Lowest MA: 18.6% |
21.2%±5.8Highest MA: 18.6% |
| Windsor and Ashburnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #178 of 282 in MA | #273 of 282 in MA | — |
| School district | Ashburnham-Westminster | Gardner | — |
| High school in town | None in town | Gardner High | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 13.5 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.