Compare towns
Abington vs Danielson vs Raynham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Abington has the most people working from home (15.1%).
Danielson has the most affordable homes ($225k median).
Raynham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+13.1%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Abington | Danielson | Raynham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 17,053Highest |
4,209Lowest |
15,505 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +6.7% U.S.: +7.4% |
+2.6%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+13.1%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 39.1±1.8 about the U.S. average |
34.5±3.6Lowest 11% below U.S. |
42.9±1.5Highest 10% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 22.2%±3.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
18.9%±6.1Lowest U.S.: 22% |
20.4%±2.8 U.S.: 22% |
| Abington and Raynham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 13.1%±1.9Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
13.6%±4.9 U.S.: 17.2% |
19.8%±2.3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Raynham and Danielson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
11.5%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
39.7% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5%±1.7 U.S.: 6.4% |
9.2%±6.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.9%±1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Danielson and Abington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $125,400±$12kHighest 55% above U.S. |
$64,050±$15kLowest 21% below U.S. |
$124,012±$16k 54% above U.S. |
| Abington and Raynham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $539,600±$34kHighest 62% above U.S. |
$224,600±$13kLowest 32% below U.S. |
$524,400±$29k 58% above U.S. |
| Abington and Raynham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,724±$250 22% above U.S. |
$1,235±$194Lowest 13% below U.S. |
$1,749±$74Highest 24% above U.S. |
| Raynham and Abington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,045Highest 126% above U.S. |
$4,009Lowest 29% above U.S. |
$6,752 116% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 50.7%±11 U.S.: 51.1% |
44.7%±17.1Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
67.1%±13.4Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Raynham and Abington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 5.2%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
21.1%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.7% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 72.7% U.S.: 65.2% |
53%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
78.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1970 10 yrs older than U.S. |
1951Lowest 29 yrs older than U.S. |
1986Highest 6 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 min 26% above U.S. |
28 minLowest 8% above U.S. |
36 minHighest 38% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 15.1%±2.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
6.6%±5.3Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
11.8%±3.4 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Abington and Raynham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #143 of 282 in MA | — | #190 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Abington | — | Bridgewater-Raynham |
| High school in town | Abington High | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.3 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.